Posts Tagged ‘Press Secretary’

Governor’s office announced this week a plan to allow Anadarko Petroleum to access 32,896 acres.

By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

Some state representatives are concerned about Gov. Ed Rendell’s decision to lease nearly 33,000 acres of state forest land to an energy company for natural gas exploration.

Rendell’s office on Tuesday announced that Anadarko Petroleum Corp. has paid the commonwealth $120 million to access 32,896 acres of state forest through a natural gas lease agreement with the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.

Prior to a presentation on the state Department of Environmental Protection’s role in regulating natural gas drilling that she attended Tuesday at Misericordia University, state Rep. Phyllis Mundy said she was disappointed to learn of the lease transaction.

“The areas that could responsibly be leased in state forests are already under lease. Why don’t they go ahead and drill there? We don’t need additional drilling, certainly not until we look into whether this is the really sensitive habitat that DCNR said it was when we discussed it,” Mundy, D-Kingston, said.

But Mundy later qualified her comments, saying they were dependent on whether leasing that acreage was previously factored as revenue in this year’s state budget. “I’m really not clear on what 32,000 acres that was,” she said.

Rendell’s press release on Tuesday did not clearly specify whether revenue from this most recent lease agreement had previously been factored into the state budget. DCNR had leased about 32,000 acres of state forest land to Anadarko in January for $128 million.

Mundy co-sponsored legislation to impose a moratorium on leasing state forest land for natural gas exploration. House Bill 2235 passed in the House and is before the state Senate.

State Rep. Karen Boback, R-Harveys Lake, who also attended the presentation at Misericordia and voted in favor of the moratorium, said she too had a problem with the lease if the revenue had not been previously included in the state budget.

Both representatives have been outspoken in their concern about potentially harmful effects of natural gas drilling on the environment and have been advocating for stronger laws and regulations to protect public heath and safety and drinking water supplies from potential contamination from gas drilling accidents.

DCNR Press Secretary Chris Novak said Wednesday the specific amount of acreage wasn’t included in this year’s budget or specified in Rendell’s 2010-11 proposal, but legislators had agreed during negotiations for this year’s budget that $180 million for the 2010-11 budget would come from oil and gas leases.

Novak said Rendell had a target of $60 million in revenue from leasing out the 32,000 acres of forest in January, but realized $128 million. That extra $68 million would be applied to the 2010-11 budget, she said.

DCNR also leased 74,000 acres of forest for natural gas exploration in September 2008. A total of 725,000 acres of the state’s 2.2 million acres of forest land has been leased for gas drilling, Novak said.

In addition to the up-front lease payments, which are considered rent for the first year of the leases, the state will receive 18 percent royalties on all natural gas produced on the land for the leases signed this month and in January. The royalty for the September 2008 lease is 16 percent.

Rent for the second through fifth years drops to $20 per acre and then increases to $35 per acre for year six and beyond, Novak said.

Novak said DCNR looked at whether important habitat for rare or endangered species and recreational use would be impacted when designing the leases. She said leases for each of the 11 tracts specify areas that cannot be disturbed by drilling.

She estimated that because of new horizontal drilling techniques and the fact that the newly leased land is surrounded by land that had been leased previously, only a minimal amount of newly leased land – probably about 300 acres total – will be impacted by drilling activities.

Anadarko spokesman Matt Carmichael would not estimate how much land would be disturbed because it was too early in the development phase.

“It’s our hope and desire to disturb as little surface area as possible,” Carmichael said.

Anadarko has drilled about 15 wells on state forest land to date, he said.

Novak said that prior to drilling activities and after the drilling is complete and wellheads are installed, the public will have full access to the leased land.

Mundy and Boback were not available for comment Wednesday after Novak responded to questions related to state budget revenue and the disturbance of sensitive state forest habitat.

Copyright: Times Leader

Revenue from tax on underground resources seen as windfall, but bill would need more support to pass.

Local municipalities could tap into the potential natural gas drilling windfall if state lawmakers are able to push through legislation that’s been stalled for more than a year.

House Bill 1373 would amend the state General County Assessment Law to explicitly make underground resources such as natural gas and oil subject to real estate assessment and taxation. The bill would require gas companies to pay taxes on the resources they extract, but wouldn’t add any tax burden to landowners.

“We’re concerned about these companies coming in and sucking up huge profits at the expense of citizens of Pennsylvania,” said state Rep. Eddie Pashinski, D-Wilkes-Barre, who is a co-sponsor of the bill.

Introduced in May 2007 by House Majority Leader Bill DeWeese, the bill was drafted in reaction to a state Supreme Court decision that ruled taxing those resources wasn’t specifically enumerated in the law. The amendment would preempt that ruling by making taxation of those resources part of the law.

Tom Andrews, DeWeese’s press secretary, said the push for the bill came from DeWeese’s constituent municipalities in western Pennsylvania, which had been relying on revenue from the resource taxes for years before it was shut off by the court decision.

However, the bill has been stalled in the House Finance Committee since May 2007, and sentiment among supporters is that state Senate Republicans, on principle, won’t support a tax bill.

“At this point, I don’t think it has the support to pass in the House, pass in the Senate and be signed by the governor, so that’s why we’ve held off on pushing it out of the House,” Andrews said.

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader