Posts Tagged ‘coordinator’

Response to gas disaster in the works

A company drilling for natural gas says it is already working with local officials.

STEVE MOCARSKY smocarsky@timesleader.com

Although the community at large hasn’t been privy to it, some local emergency management officials have been working closely with an energy company to draft emergency response plans to address any local natural gas drilling-related catastrophe that might occur.

EnCana Oil & Gas USA is slated to begin drilling a well at a site in Fairmount Township in about a month, and many local residents, officials and emergency responders have become anxious, feeling left-in-the-dark about whether local emergency responders have the equipment, knowledge and protocols in place to handle a drilling-related catastrophe.

But Wendy Wiedenbeck, public and community relations advisor for EnCana, said local firefighters would not be responsible for containing or fighting a gas well fire or gas release at a well site.

“In the event of an incident, local emergency responders will be asked to provide support to our operations personnel who are specially trained to deal with incidents at oil and gas locations,” Wiedenbeck said.

“Should a serious well-control incident occur, such as release of gas or fire, EnCana will look to local emergency responders to provide support while EnCana calls upon well-control experts to assist in addressing such an incident,” she said.

The well-control company EnCana has identified in an Emergency Response Plan submitted to the state Department of Environmental Protection is Wild Well Control in Houston, Texas. A second call would be placed to Cudd Well Control, also in Houston.

“Depending on the severity of the well-control issue, they would respond as soon as possible. In the meantime, the area around the well – the exact area again depends on the well-control issue – would be secured and/or evacuated. This is another example of how Encana and local emergency responders will work together,” Wiedenbeck said.

Wiedenbeck said Encana has experienced well-control incidents in the past, and the risks are inherent in the oil and natural gas industry.

“Our training, systems, and protocols are designed to fit the level risk associated with the activity. Our goal is to minimize the risk and to operate in a safe manner. Safety is our number one priority,” she said.

County office works on plan

Steve Bekanich, coordinator of the Luzerne County Emergency Management Agency, said last week that he has had several conversations with EnCana officials, but a volunteer with the county EMA “has taken the lead for my office. … We are close to completing an emergency response plan.”

Bekanich said Barney Dobinick, who is also the EMA coordinator for Lake Township, is “handling all direct talks with EnCana for ease of operations. He’s briefing me almost on a daily basis. … I’m very comfortable with what Barney has been doing. He’s been a trusted staff member for 20 years.”

Dobinick said a 230-page set of response guidelines is near completion. After meeting with EnCana representatives in mid-June, the plan will be shared with area municipal officials for their approval and made available to the public. Sometime in the next few, a public meeting also will be scheduled to gather input and answer questions.

Until the plan is complete, Dobinick said it would be counter-productive to release any aspects of it until EnCana has reviewed it and possible changes are made.

“If we determine there’s a better way, we’ll amend it. We’re not hiding anything. We just want to have a complete plan in place (before it’s released),” he said.

Bekanich said adjustments can be made even after the plan is disseminated to municipal officials and input is gathered from the public.

Dobinick did say, however, that local emergency responders would handle some emergencies at well sites, for example, a brush fire, an office trailer or vehicle fire or a hazardous materials spill.

Jack Dodson, emergency management coordinator for Dallas Township and Kunkle fire chief, has said his major concern was having emergency personnel who might have to extract disaster victims from a well-related catastrophe prepared to do so.

Dobinick said there are response guidelines for mass-casualty incidents, getting basic and advanced life support on-scene and implementing a disaster plan for hospitals and medical air transport.

“And depending on the seriousness of an event, it would determine how much, if any, of an area would be evacuated,” Dobinick said.

Off-site also part of concern

Dobinick said he’s more concerned about local responses to off-site incidents, such as the crash of a truck carrying “residual backflow” material, or “frack water” used in the hydraulic fracturing of the Marcellus Shale formation.

He said fire departments would handle the initial stabilization of such an incident and work to prevent contamination of any nearby waterway. A state-certified hazardous material clean-up team would come in if needed to remove the material and any contaminated soil.

Dobinick said he feels “very comfortable” with the guidelines and hopes to have the majority of the document complete by the end of the week. He’s still waiting on some information from the county 911 office and the American Red Cross.

Plus, Bekanich noted that Luzerne County is a member of and has access to the resources of the East Central Pennsylvania Regional Task Force – a seven-county all-hazards task force formed in 1998 along with eight other such task forces in the state in response to terrorist threats.

Bekanich said 48 professionals from Luzerne, Wyoming, Schuylkill, Colombia, Northumberland, Montour and Berks counties attended a training event/exercise last week at the county EMA headquarters and worked on a scenario to determine “how we would bring logistics and resources together for an event such as a catastrophic well failure.”

If a catastrophe did occur, Bekanich said, “it’s not like we would be in this on our own. We have resources and technical expertise from seven other counties to rely on for support.”

Dobinick also said EnCana has commissioned a transportation study and will be sitting down with officials from the Lake-Lehman School District to address any concerns about incidents that could affect school bus routes.

Several area residents have voiced concerns about emergency response and traffic at public meetings over the last few months and have been dissatisfied with information supplied by EnCana.

Company schedules meetings

Wiedenbeck said meetings with stakeholders are scheduled for this week.

“Our goal is to understand how these agencies work together, how our operations impact them and how we can work together to make sure we collectively work together so local emergency responders continue to do the great job they’re already doing,” Widenebeck said.

The purpose of sitting down with Dobinick and others is to determine the capabilities of local responders and “if there are gaps, how do we fill them.”

In some instances, Wiedenbeck said, there might be grants available to purchase emergency response equipment that might be needed – for example, a new radio system.

“Our job is to work together with emergency responders, the recreation district, township supervisors and the school district to understand existing protocols and how those protocols might be impacted if there is an incident. We also need to understand existing resources, identify potential gaps and solutions for addressing the gaps, if any,” Wiedenbeck said.

Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.

Copyright: Times Leader

Study boosts Shale’s fiscal pluses for Pa.

PSU report touts job growth, increased taxes; planned severance tax a concern. Others say study inflates benefits.

STEVE MOCARSKY smocarsky@timesleader.com

Development of the Marcellus Shale has the potential to create more than 200,000 jobs in Pennsylvania during the next 10 years, according to an update to a Penn State University study released on Monday.

The report warned, however, that imposing a state severance tax on the natural gas industry, as Gov. Ed Rendell has proposed, could induce energy companies to redirect their investments to other shale “plays” in the United States. Plays refers to natural gas development in other shale developments.

If that happened, any revenues gained from a severance tax could be offset by losses in sales taxes and income taxes resulting from lower drilling activity and natural gas production as producers shift their capital spending to other shale plays.

Some, however, have expressed doubt about the impact of a severance tax and claims and assumptions about economic benefits and job growth in the report.

The update, commissioned by the Marcellus Shale Coalition, was conducted by professors with the university’s Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering. It supplements a study the department released last July.

The updated study also states that during just the next 18 months, gas drilling activities are expected to create more than $1.8 billion in state and local tax revenues.

“At a time when more than half-a-million people in Pennsylvania are currently out of work, the release of this updated report from Penn State … confirms the critical role that responsible energy development in the commonwealth can play in substantially, perhaps even permanently, reversing that trend,” Kathryn Klaber, president and executive director of the Marcellus Shale Coalition, said in a press release.

“Last year alone, Marcellus producers paid more than $1.7 billion to landowners across the state, and spent more than $4.5 billion total to make these resources available. By the end of this year, that number is expected to double, and millions of Pennsylvanians will find themselves the direct beneficiaries of that growth,” Klaber said.

The updated study finds that Marcellus development will create more than 111,000 new jobs by 2011, a result of an increase in the number of wells developed from the roughly 1,400 in operation today to 2,200 expected during the next 18 months.

All told, by 2011, this work is expected to deliver nearly $1 billion in annual tax revenue to state and local governments.

In addition to generating tax revenue, natural gas development stimulates the economy in two major ways: business-to-business spending and payments to land owners, the study states.

Exploring, drilling, processing and transporting natural gas requires goods and services from many sectors of the economy, such as construction, trucking, steelmaking and engineering services. Gas companies also pay lease and royalty payments to land owners, who also spend and pay taxes on this income.

In 2009, Marcellus gas producers spent a total of $4.5 billion to develop Marcellus Shale gas resources, drilling 710 wells that year. The writers estimate that this spending added $3.9 billion in value to the economy and generated $389 million in state and local tax revenues, and more than 44,000 jobs.

Based on energy company plans to drill 1,743 wells this year, value-added dollars, tax revenue and jobs creation are expected to approximately double for 2010, according to the report. And by 2015, the numbers are expected to nearly double from this year.

Some question PSU report

While the report paints a rosy economic picture for the state, assuming that no severance tax is imposed, some are leery of assumptions and claims made in the report.

Dick Martin, coordinator of the Pennsylvania Forest Coalition, an alliance of outdoor enthusiasts, landowners, churches and conservation groups, first notes a disclaimer in the study, that Penn State does not guarantee the accuracy or usefulness of the information.

Martin said the study contains some flaws.

While the study states that development costs are higher in the Marcellus Shale than in other shale plays, “the industry itself tells its shareholders that the Marcellus is a low-cost gas deposit,” he said.

“Chesapeake Energy has told its shareholders that it can make a 10 percent return when gas prices are at only $2.59 per thousand cubic feet. Gas price today is $4.08,” Martin said.

Martin also said the study relies on data and assumptions supplied by the gas industry and that it looks only at benefits and not at costs to communities, infrastructure, environment and regulators.

He said the study does not look at data from other states that either imposed or raised severance taxes. He said there is no evidence that severance taxes affect either production or investment in states that impose or raise severance taxes.

Martin pointed to a review by the state Budget and Policy Center of the study Penn State released in July, saying the review is still valid because the update is based on the 2009 report and used the same methodology.

The review claims that the 2009 Penn State report “overplays the positive impacts of increased natural gas production, while minimizing the negative.”

Among other flaws, the report “exaggerates the impact a severance tax would have on development of the Marcellus Shale and overstates what taxes the industry now pays, going so far as to count fishing and hunting license fees paid by those who benefit from the industry as a tax due to industry activity,” the review states.

Also according to the review, the report acknowledges that many drillers will avoid corporate taxes, paying the much lower personal income tax or avoiding taxes altogether through deductions.

The report also “inflates the economic impact of expanded gas production in Pennsylvania to puff up the industry’s economic promise,” the review states.

Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.

Copyright: Times Leader